Applications must be submitted online during the application period.

To apply, you must:

• Complete and submit your application form online on the Australian Sports Commission website
• Provide all the information requested on the application form

Please ensure your application is complete and accurate. Giving false or misleading information is a serious offence under the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth). We will investigate false or misleading information and may not consider your application for the grant.

If you find an error in your application after submitting it, you should notify us immediately at funding@ausport.gov.au. You cannot change your application after the closing date and time, unless invited to by the ASC.

The ASC will not accept applications submitted after the published deadline, unless it is satisfactorily proven that a technical issue has prevented the applicant from submitting their application in time.

If you have any questions regarding the 2025 ASC Research and innovation Grants Program, please contact the ASC Research Office via aisresearch@ausport.gov.au

The ASC adopts the ARC’s Research Opportunity and Performance Evidence (ROPE) Statement, supporting equitable access to research funding. The ASC is seeking to increase equity in grant programs through improved advertising mechanisms and changes to the application and selection processes.

The ASC will appoint a Selection Committee to:

• Assess and shortlist applications; and
• Make a recommendation related to the successful applicants.

The Selection Committee comprises of:

• Relevant members of ASC staff
• A representative of the National Sport Advisory Group not an applicant to the grant
• An independent representative from the Australian Sport Sector

During the assessment, the ASC may request additional information, which does not change the nature of the application. Applications will undergo a preliminary review by ASC R&D Administration to determine eligibility, prior to being scored and ranked by the Selection Committee.

After shortlisting, the ASC will interview shortlisted applicants to clarify details of the proposed R&D application. Final determination of grant allocation will be decided by the Grant Approver.

In agreement with the Australian Research Council’s suggestion, the ASC recommends all assessors undergo a process to identify and raise awareness of personal biases, question the basis for thoughts and feelings, build skills in cultural diversity and reflect on the strength of a culture that embraces differences.

Assessment Considerations

All applications will be considered through a competitive process, based on how well they meet the assessment considerations and how they are ranked against each other.

Below is a list of considerations that will guide decision-making by the Selection Committee.

Criterion 1 – Investigators – 40%

Assessment against the ‘investigators’ criterion should include consideration of the opportunities the applicants have had to build their profiles.*

• Demonstrable expertise and capability to address the research priority, including assessment of publications, previous work in the sport sector and/or R&I impact #
• Access to resources needed to complete the project (including but not limited to peer support, statistician, software, contacts in the sports sector etc)

Criterion 2 –Value for Money – 30%

Assessment of the budget request, in kind contributions and leverage of funding.

• Demonstrable contributions and leverage of funding
• Well justified and detailed budget, deliverables and timelines

Criterion 3 – Project – 30%

• High-quality R&I project, with a clear research question/s (needs-driven) and information related to the appropriate design, feasibility, data management procedures, data analysis, and reporting.
• Reach (potential beneficiaries of the proposed activity; inclusive design)
• Impact (output with measurable positive impact on sport; either short- and/or long-term impact)
• Commitment to conducting the research activity according to the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 and, when applicable, in line with the "Recommendations for conducting AIS-supported research in high performance sport".

* For example, researchers who are early in their research career or have had an interrupted research career, including employment outside academia, unemployment, child birth, carers’ responsibilities and other personal circumstances, will have this taken into account. This provides assessors with information to determine whether a Principal Investigator (PI) has had extensive opportunity for research compared to a PI who may have had more limited time for research. In this way, the quality and benefit of achievements are given more weight than the quantity or rate of particular achievements enabling excellent researchers to be competitive regardless of their career path. (from: https://www.arc.gov.au/funding-research/peer-review/assessment-process)

# For example, assessment of the publications track record will not include a list of all publications, and will instead focus on up to 10 of the Research Group’s nominated best publications from the past 10 years (taking into consideration career disruptions). This will help to ensure that assessment of publication track record focuses on the quality and contribution to science rather than the quantity of publications. (adapted from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/funding/peer-review-system/publication-assessment-track-record)

The Manager, ASC Research and Innovation, following the Selection Committee recommendations, will submit a proposal to the Grant Approver, the ASC Executive GM, Strategy, Insights and Innovation who makes the final decision including:

• The grant amount to be awarded;
• The duration of the grant, and
• The terms and conditions of the grant.

All applicants will be notified by email of the outcome of their application including:

• Any funding amount to be awarded
• The duration of the grant, if awarded
• The specific terms and conditions of any funding.

Successful applicants will be required to enter a ‘Research Funding Agreement’ (RFA) with the ASC. The Agreement will set out the general terms of the relationship, with details of specific research projects to be set out in the ‘Project Schedules’ of the Agreement. Funding will be granted upon signing the Agreement, but specific project funding will be allocated by mutual agreement in accordance with the relevant provisions in the Agreement.

The ASC has a strategic mandate to generate knowledge for the benefit of the Australian sports sector through its research funding. Therefore, the research funding agreement for successful applicants, seeks a licence for the ASC to share the results of research with the sports sector. More broadly, research applicants are expected to be compliant with the National Principles of Intellectual Property Management for Publicly Funded Research.

Applicants should also be aware that breaches of the funding agreement or failure to comply with agreed obligations may affect the eligibility of future grant applications.

At its absolute discretion, the ASC may contact unsuccessful applicants to discuss elements of their application, unless otherwise indicated in the application process.

Any conflicts of interest could affect the performance of the grant opportunity or Program. There may be a conflict of interest, or perceived conflict of interest, if ASC staff, any member of the Assessment Panel, a committee or advisor, and/or the applicant, for example:

• has a professional, commercial or personal relationship with a party who is able to influence the application selection process, such as an ASC officer, or a member of an external panel;
• has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation which is likely to interfere with or restrict the applicants from carrying out the proposed activities fairly and independently; or
• has a relationship with, or interest in, an organisation from which they will receive personal gain because the organisation receives a grant under the grant Program.

Applicants will be asked to declare, as part of your application, any perceived or existing conflicts of interests or that, to the best of your knowledge, there is no conflict of interest. If you later identify an actual, apparent, or potential conflict of interest, the ASC must be informed in writing immediately.

Conflicts of interest for ASC staff will be handled in accordance with ASC’s Conflict of Interest Policy. Selection Committee members will also be required to declare any conflicts of interest.

The ASC will treat any personal information in accordance with the Privacy ACT 1988 and the Australian Privacy Principles.

Personal information can only be disclosed to someone for the primary purpose for which it is collected unless an exemption applies.

Personal information submitted via the online application is collected by the ASC for the purpose of considering applications for and administering the Program.

The personal details of successful applicants (including name, home state, sport, the value of the grant awarded and a brief description of the purpose for the program) may be released by the ASC to the public and the media for the use of promotional and educational purposes.

To view the ASC Privacy Policy visit: https://www.sportaus.gov.au/legal_information/privacy_policy