Principle
A board should be a diverse group of people who collectively provide different perspectives and experience to facilitate more considered decision-making.
What should a good board look like?
Boards are best able to fulfil their roles and responsibilities when the directors have a diversity of skills, perspectives and backgrounds and a culture that values this diversity. This diversity of perspective means the board is more likely to consider different options, risks and implications leading to more informed decision-making.
The differences in size and capability across sporting organisations means there is no single formula for how a board should look. Each organisation should aim to have a board which reflects its needs and goals. Some areas of expertise will be generic to all boards (e.g. finance, law, governance) while other expertise will be more dependent on the strategy of the organisation and the skills and experience it needs to execute the strategy at a particular time (e.g. digital transformation or high performance). Board composition should also consider gender, age, and cultural and linguistic background, as well as geographic location, independence from the sport and professional background.
How do we get the ‘right’ people on the board?
The priority in board composition is building the best board, not assembling a group of the best individuals. A narrow focus on who would be the ‘best’ director can lead to missing out on the ‘right’ director. Good boards will have a mix of elected and appointed directors. Elected directors are selected by the members through a voting process while appointed directors are selected by the board. A robust nominations process, with a nominations committee where appropriate, has an important role in supporting and educating members to understand how the skill and background of the nominees for election will contribute to the board’s functioning and achievement of the strategic goals.
What are some red flags?
Within a sport, directors should only sit on the board of one organisation at a time. That is, an individual should not be on a state and national board of the same sport. Furthermore, while experience within a member body can be a valuable perspective, this experience in and of itself does not mean an individual would be a suitable director. It is also recommended that an ex-CEO should not become a director for at least three years to allow a new CEO the autonomy to take on the role.
Example behaviours and actions
Recommendations
A set of good practice suggestions, which should underpin the Board’s considerations in applying this principle.
Resources and tools to help
Head to the National Governance Resource Library for resources and tools.
For guidance, or to discuss how your organisation may best implement good practice in this area, please contact your State/Territory agency for sport and recreation.
For NSOs, email your query to SportsGovernance@ausport.gov.au and a consultant will contact you.